Dangers of Imaginary Property Laws

[owsf2000]

"The jist of it works like this: Owners of a Copyright have to defend their copyright against any form of copyright abuse--or they lose it. "

No. That is NOT how it works.

I was going to write up a lengthy note regarding the differences between patents, copyright, and trademarks (trademarks are what need to be defended or you lose it.) but instead this is all I will say in response to what someone said in the Kotaku comments regarding the Silver Lining and why Activision just HAD to crush the fan game.

Comments

[kane-magus.livejournal.com]

I take that back, actually.

The last month on GOG.com (http://www.gog.com) has been "Activision month (http://www.gog.com/en/page/month_of_activision)" and a good chunk of those have been old Sierra games.

So, let me revise my previous statement from "Activision has done exactly jack and shit with the Sierra stuff so far" to "Activision has done jack and shit with the Sierra stuff so far, aside from milking up to 25 year old games for minimal effort." "Minimal effort" in this case assumes that Activision had at least some hand in getting the games XP/Vista compatible and that it wasn't solely the effort of the GOG guys themselves, of course. Regardless of whether Activision had a hand in it, I'm sure they're taking a cut of the sales either way.

[owsf2000.livejournal.com]

Looks like they weren't content to screw up the Silver Lining, they also shook up Infinity Ward by firing the people in charge. Great way to thank them for putting a billion dollars in Activision's bank account I suppose with Modern Warfare 2 but what do I know. (Yeah, plenty of articles about it over on Kotaku.)

[kane-magus.livejournal.com]

It used to be that EA was the Big Evil of the video games industry, no contest, but these days I honestly can't decide whether Activision has managed to steal their crown yet or not. If they haven't, they likely will soon.