These kinds of things are driving me away from the gaming industry altogether. I will still be getting a PS3, but this pretty much tells you why I will never be hooking it up to the internet.
Seriously, things like that should automatically void a terms-of-service. Although apparently the supreme court of the US has already judged that it can be enforced in the US at the very least. I suspect Sony will still be receiving class actions in europe, etc.
Seriously, things like that should automatically void a terms-of-service. Although apparently the supreme court of the US has already judged that it can be enforced in the US at the very least. I suspect Sony will still be receiving class actions in europe, etc.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-20 06:14 pm (UTC)As for abandonware, I definitely agree with you in that the law sees things in black and white. No surprise there. But then, the law sees a lot of things in purely black and white with no mitigating circumstances in between, at least when it comes to issues of copyright and such. This is due in no small part to the copyright holders themselves (or their lobbyists, anyway) being the ones who are drafting a lot of such laws these days, so of course they're not going to allow any wiggle room for things like abandonware or whatever. I'm sure you'll agree that's part of the problem as well. The main reason I'd personally say it was a "gray area" is when comparing it to the dickweeds who torrent new shit with no qualms whatsoever, regardless of their supposed justifications to do so. Compared to those assholes, the ones who download mere abandonware are far less deserving of being vilified in my eyes, at least if there is literally no other legit way to get the game in question. If however, a legit way to buy it becomes available, such as if it shows up on GOG at some point, for example, or, in the case of console games, on Wii VC/XBLA/PSN/etc., then my sympathy for them once again drops to zero.