Then you're going to get bitten in the ass by this thing later on if you fully expect to be playing your PS3 games just fine in 10 years time.
Patches are around because they're possible with a harddrive attached to your console. Harddrives aren't exactly the most reliable piece of computer equipment ever developed. Buggy games exist as a result of patching being available. If you couldn't patch, the developers would be forced to deliver finished products.
"I don't like paying $60 to be a beta-tester."
DLC is mostly a case of them ripping stuff out of a game that would have normally come with the game, just so they can charge you an extra 5-10 bucks per "extra".
Your idea that they would allow external patching is laughable at best btw. They're not doing it already because it can be seen as a security breach or a way for hackers to inject customized "patches" through that system to jailbreak it. Hell, that's how that new usb method for jailbreaking the PS3 that Sony is dead set on killing currently works.
The most I'm holding hope on is that in the dying days of the console they'll start selling cheap dvds that will be filled with bug patches from as many games as possible. And I don't think they'll do that. There's more money in leaving the games as broken as possible so they can offer it for sale again on the next system as a digital download, etc.
If you see me laughing at you when you whine about it in the future, don't take it too hard, just take it as a "I told you so." You have no reason whatsoever to expect them to do what's in the best interest of gamers at the end of the day if they haven't already started doing it now. There's too much potential for reselling the same product to people with their current set up.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-08-30 03:39 am (UTC)Patches are around because they're possible with a harddrive attached to your console. Harddrives aren't exactly the most reliable piece of computer equipment ever developed. Buggy games exist as a result of patching being available. If you couldn't patch, the developers would be forced to deliver finished products.
"I don't like paying $60 to be a beta-tester."
DLC is mostly a case of them ripping stuff out of a game that would have normally come with the game, just so they can charge you an extra 5-10 bucks per "extra".
Your idea that they would allow external patching is laughable at best btw. They're not doing it already because it can be seen as a security breach or a way for hackers to inject customized "patches" through that system to jailbreak it. Hell, that's how that new usb method for jailbreaking the PS3 that Sony is dead set on killing currently works.
The most I'm holding hope on is that in the dying days of the console they'll start selling cheap dvds that will be filled with bug patches from as many games as possible. And I don't think they'll do that. There's more money in leaving the games as broken as possible so they can offer it for sale again on the next system as a digital download, etc.
If you see me laughing at you when you whine about it in the future, don't take it too hard, just take it as a "I told you so." You have no reason whatsoever to expect them to do what's in the best interest of gamers at the end of the day if they haven't already started doing it now. There's too much potential for reselling the same product to people with their current set up.