ext_40230 ([identity profile] kane-magus.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] owsf2000 2010-07-29 05:38 pm (UTC)

I'm just glad that it doesn't have an "estimated value" of all the games on one's list, because that could be a bit depressing (or perhaps brag-worthy depending upon one's mindset). Then again, I've got my ign and gamespot lists to handle that, I guess... ¬_¬ Even if they don't give nearly the same values. And I don't keep them as up-to-date as backloggery these days.

...or at least they used to do that. Guess they don't anymore, or if it is still there it's hidden away somewhere I can't find at the moment. (And apparently ign has updated the format of the way they display the lists since last I checked a while back, which, for the record, is quite ass.)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting